Explain why the EDI is a community-level tool, not an individual assessment
Connect EDI data to your own role and community context
Definition
The Early Development Instrument (EDI)
is a population-level tool
that gives district leaders, policymakers, and community stakeholders a holistic view of how well
neighborhoods are supporting child development in the years before kindergarten.
Midway through the school year, kindergarten teachers complete a
103-question survey
for every child in their class. The questionnaires cover
five domains:
physical health and well-being, emotional maturity, social competence, language and cognitive
skills, and communication and general knowledge. Students are not present and do not take a
test. Teachers complete the EDI based on their knowledge of their students, and the data is
reported by census tract,
never by individual student. Collected once every three years, it tracks how child well-being
changes over time across entire neighborhoods.
Think of it like early childhood weather radar. It does not track any single raindrop. What it
shows is the conditions across an entire community, where children arrive at kindergarten well
supported, and where the forecast suggests they may need more support. In other words, where in
your community is it sunny and where is it cloudy in terms of childhood well-being? We make
decisions based on weather radar all the time, now we have a similar resource for childhood
development decision making.
One thing worth naming clearly: the EDI is not a screener, not a diagnostic, and not an
evaluation of teachers or schools.
History and Context
The EDI is used internationally, and has been implemented nationwide in Canada since 1998,
where it originated. A 2021 review of EDI studies reports that the EDI has been adapted
and validated in many countries, including Australia, Ireland, Scotland, Sweden, Brazil,
Chile, Estonia, Peru, Jordan, Mexico, and the United States (Janus, M.; Reid-Westoby, C.).
The Offord Centre for Child Studies at McMaster University leads the EDI implementation
in Canada, helping provinces and local communities develop plans to improve child outcomes.
In the United States, the Center for Healthier Children, Families, and Communities at UCLA
has partnered with organizations to administer the EDI across the nation since 2009.
What is it, and what is it not?
Tap any card to flip it.
Which of these correctly describes how the EDI is completed?
Correct. Teachers complete the EDI based on their knowledge of each student. No student is ever present or tested.
Not quite. Students are never present for the EDI. Teachers complete it on their own based on their observations of each child.
Not quite. Principals do not complete the EDI. It is completed by kindergarten teachers for every child in their class.
Why It Matters
Unlike many school readiness assessments, the EDI reports on groups of children instead of on
individual students. This population-level assessment takes the onus of school-readiness off
teachers and schools by measuring how children are doing at the neighborhood level, never at the
classroom or individual level. Communities can use this information to support school readiness
in the early childhood community as well as how to react to the specific needs of incoming
classes of students. This community-level information helps early
childhood partners coordinate to promote healthy development for all young children.
Spark Question
Spark Question
What patterns might we notice if we shift from looking at individual children to looking at
how groups of children are developing across a community?
One perspective
When we shift to a population-level view, patterns that are invisible at the individual
level begin to emerge. We may notice that children in certain neighborhoods consistently
arrive at kindergarten with challenges in emotional development, even when academic
skills appear strong. The question shifts from what is wrong with this child to what
conditions in this community are shaping these outcomes. That is where the EDI becomes a
planning tool, not just a measurement.
Dive into the Dashboard
EDI results are brought to life through interactive dashboards that map how children are doing
across neighborhoods in your community. Rather than rows of numbers, you are looking at a
geographic picture, one that makes it immediately visible where children are thriving and where
patterns of vulnerability are concentrated. The map does not tell you why things look the way
they do, but it tells you where to start asking questions.
What you are looking for
Geographic ClustersWhere do similar percentages group together?
Contrast ZonesWhich neighboring census tracts look unexpectedly different?
Strong AreasWhere are children consistently on track across neighborhoods?
Uneven PatternsWhere does the map suggest developmental variation across place?
Role-Specific Lens
The EDI means something a little different depending on where you sit. A principal thinks about
how to communicate it to staff and families. A superintendent sees it as a district planning
tool. A community lead uses it to build the case for early childhood investment with partners.
Same data, different entry points.
What everyone shares, regardless of role, is a responsibility to communicate about the EDI
accurately. How this tool gets described, in hallways, at board meetings, in community
presentations, shapes whether it gets used well or if it is misunderstood. The goal is not just
to know what the EDI is, but to be someone who helps others understand it too.
Your entry point
Principals are key thought
leaders for the EDI. How this tool gets described in hallways, at parent
nights, and in newsletters shapes how it is used and understood.
Reflect on how your role connects to children's early experiences and development.
Consider what population-level data can show that individual stories alone cannot.
Begin thinking about what conditions in your community may be shaping child development outcomes.
Your entry point
The EDI helps
districts form upstream investment decisions by connecting education gaps to
neighborhood conditions.
Reflect on how your role connects to children's early experiences and development.
Consider what population-level data can show that individual stories alone cannot.
Begin thinking about what conditions in your community may be shaping child development outcomes.
Your entry point
You use population-level data to build the case for early childhood investment with
funders, city agencies, and nonprofit partners. EDI gives you a common language that
crosses sector boundaries.
Reflect on how your role connects to children's early experiences and development.
Consider what population-level data can show that individual stories alone cannot.
Begin thinking about what conditions in your community may be shaping child development outcomes.
Success Story
A community used EDI data to move from general concern about school readiness to a more specific
understanding of how development patterns differed across neighborhoods. This helped partners
align around a shared picture of need and begin asking what local conditions and supports might
be influencing those outcomes.
Arkansas — Excel by Eight
Founded in 2011 with a holistic vision for child development, Excel by Eight and their
more than 30 partner organizations saw the EDI as a natural fit for understanding how
communities were supporting young children. Beginning in 2018, they piloted the EDI
across six counties. The results did not sit on a shelf. They directly shaped the goals
of local communities and informed the services provided by Community School Coordinators
on the ground.
That early work laid the foundation for what is now a statewide effort, led by the
Arkansas Research Center with funding from The ADE Office of Early Childhood, to bring the EDI to every county in
Arkansas.
Check for Understanding
A parent approaches you after a school meeting and says: "I heard the school is testing my child
for the EDI, what is that about?" You have 30 seconds. What do you say?
"I heard the school is testing my child for the EDI. What is that about?"
Which of the following best describes the EDI?
Correct. The EDI measures development at the neighborhood level and is never used to assess individual children or evaluate teachers.
Not quite. The EDI is never administered to students. It measures community-level development patterns.